You are here: Home ยป Blog

Eclipse Luna crashes with KDE on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty)

Posted on Monday, February 16 2015 at 20:47 | Category: Java | 1 Comment(s)

This is an issue I came across today, after I upgraded my system to Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty) some days ago and after I also upgraded to Eclipse Luna 4.4.1 (using JDK 8u31):

When importing an existing project into the workspace, the "Import Projects" dialog (where you can select the root directory) still opens, but then the JVM crashes with this assertion:

java: /build/buildd/gtk2-engines-oxygen-1.4.5/src/animations/oxygencomboboxdata.cpp:87: 
void Oxygen::ComboBoxData::setButton(GtkWidget*): Assertion `!_button._widget' failed.

After some searching, I found that this is a known KDE bug (there is also a corresponding Eclipse bug) and it has already been fixed in oxygen-gtk2-1.4.6. This version is already available in Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid), but not yet in 14.04, so I crated a backport package - you can get it from my Personal Package Archive. After installing the upgraded package, the issue is gone (what remains is a message like Oxygen::WindowManager::wmButtonPress - warning: a button was already set for this combobox which is obvious when we look at the diff (have a look at the oxygencomboboxdata.cpp file).

A different workaround in case you do not want or can install the new oxygen-gtk version is to set a different GTK style in the KDE control center:

Open the KDE System settings and select "Application Appearance". In the dialog choose the GTK category and choose a different GTK style in the "Select a GTK2 Theme" dropdown, e.g. "Ambiance" as in the example below:

Implementing a custom EL resolver in ADF

Posted on Thursday, January 15 2015 at 08:05 | Category: Oracle ADF & JDeveloper | 0 Comment(s)

New tutorial available: Implementing a custom EL resolver in ADF shows how to implement, register and use a custom EL resolver in Oracle ADF.

Runtime-defined properties in EL expressions

Posted on Monday, January 12 2015 at 08:47 | Category: Oracle ADF & JDeveloper | 0 Comment(s)

Expression Language (EL) is used to access application logic (Managed Beans) from the presentation logic (JSF pages and page fragments). Assume that we have a class called com.example.SomeBeanImpl which is registered as a managed bean called someBean. Then, an expression like #{someBean.someProperty} essentially calls the getSomeProperty() method of the com.example.SomeBeanImpl class whenever the expression is used in a read operation, and calls the setSomeProperty() method of the com.example.SomeBeanImpl class whenever the expression is used in a write operation. Note that this requires that there are explicit setter and getter methods for each property accessible from an EL expression. If the expression tries to access a property for which there is no corresponding getter or setter, an exception is thrown.

So, adding the getters and setters for the properties is a compile time operation - the class needs to contain the required methods. However, for some scenarios, it might be useful to be able to define properties at runtime. In fact, the ADF engine does this in several places - one example are the "row" or "node" variables for the <af:table> or <af:treeTable> components to reference one row of a table or a tree table. Even though there is one specific java class used inside the ADF runtime which represents one row or node, it is possible to access all of the table's attributes through those classes (and the ADF runtime does not synthesize any specific classes during build- or runtime):

<af:table value="#{myManagedBean.allEmployees}"  
          var="emp">    <!-- Internally, instanciates a class used as the container for one row -->
    <af:outputText value="#{emp.ename}"/>   <!-- Accesses the "ename" property of the row -->
    <af:outputText value="#{emp.deptno}"/>  <!-- Accesses the "deptno" property of the row -->

In this example, we can access the ename and the depto properties of the row container class, even through this internal container class will certainly not have corresponding getters and setters available (as their names depend on the attributes of the associated view objects). ADF internally further routes those accesses to the proper view object rows.

EL Resolvers

The J2EE concept which allows such "dynamic" beans with properties defined at runtime is called "EL Resolvers". Essentially, the EL engine is using EL resolvers each time it needs to evaluate an expression. For example, by default there is a BeanELResolver which resolves properties which correspond to the JavaBeans specification, using getter and setter methods as described above. However, there are also other resolvers like MapELResolver which can access properties which are stored in a Map, and it is also possible to define custom EL resolvers to implement a custom property resolver for more unique requirements. Resolvers can be chained together by using a CompositeELResolver - the CompositeELResolver iterates over all its resolvers until one resolver was able to evaluate the expression.

The Java EE 5 Tutorial: EL Resolvers  gives additional information and shows a list of standard resolvers. The JavaServer Pages Specification, chapter JSP2.9: Resolution of Variables and their Properties describes the resolution process in more detail and shows the order in which the CompositeELResolver resolves properties by default. The JavaDoc at describes the Java classes used in the EL resolvers API.


A simple approach to implement beans with runtime properties as described above is to have the managed bean implement the Map interface. This lets the default CompositeELResolver use the MapELResolver to resolve its expressions. According to 5 Reasons to Use Composition over Inheritance in Java and OOP, we will not inherit from a container class, but implement the required interface and then delegate to a HashMap instance:

public class DynamicPropertyBean implements Map<String, Object> {
    public DynamicPropertyBean() {
        put("value1", 42L);
        put("value2", "Hello");

    private Map<String, Object> theMap = new HashMap<>();

    public int size() {
        return theMap.size();

    public boolean isEmpty() {
        return theMap.isEmpty();

    // All additional required methods from the Map interface

If this bean is registered with the name dynamicBean, we can access the properties "value1" and "value2" like #{dynamicBean.value1} and #{dynamicBean.value2}. All other property names will return an empty value - there will be no exception thrown, and the CompositeELResolver will also not try any other resolver further down in the chain, such as BeanELResolver, to resolve the property name. If we want to catch accesses to unknown properties, we either need to further tweek the methods which implement the Map interface (instead of simply delegating), or implement a custom EL resolver.

Some background on Generics: dumping a Map

Posted on Wednesday, December 17 2014 at 11:16 | Category: Java | 0 Comment(s)

In Java, dumping a Map to see what key/value mappings it contains is quite easy. Lets assume we have a factory method which returns a map, containing some String to Long mappings:

Map<String, Long> map = createMap();

The toString() method of the Collection classes usually provide a useful implementation, so that we can simply use


to dump the map. If we want to have more control over the output format, e.g. one line per map entry, we can use a simple loop to iterate over the entries:

Set<Entry<String, Long>> entries = map.entrySet();
for (Entry<String, Long> entry : entries) {
    String key = entry.getKey();
    Long value = entry.getValue();
    System.err.printf("%s=%s\n", key, value);

When running this code with the map returned from the createMap() method, we get

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: com.example.Key cannot be cast to java.lang.String
	at com.example.MapSample.main(

Ehm... wait a moment ... why do we get this exception in the line which executes String key = entry.getKey();? We did not get any compile time errors or even warnings, and entry.getKey() is declared to return a String due to the definition of entry as Entry<String, Long>. Also, the Map is declared as Map<String, Long> - so each key element in the map must be a String, right?


Lets examine how the map is created in the createMap() factory method:

private Map<String, Long> createMap() {
    Map result = new HashMap();
    result.put("one",  1L);
    result.put(new Key(), 3L);
    result.put("two",  2L);
    result.put("five",  5L);
    result.put("four",  4L);
    return result;

Obviously, we are allowed to use different types than String as a key, an instance of the Key class in this case. This is possible since Map and HashMap are used as raw types here, instead of parameterized types. The Java compiler will issue some warnings, but will still compile the method as such (and even the warnings can be switched off with an annotation like @SuppressWarnings({ "unchecked", "rawtypes" })).

Remember that Generics (paremeterized types) are syntactic sugar only - internally, during runtime, everything is raw types, with the necessary casts automatically applied where necessary. These casts succeed when the parameterized types are used throughout the application. If this was properly done in the createMap() method, the compiler would not let us use Key as a key value. However, due to the usage of Map as raw type, we can. And then, during runtime, the casts mentioned before will fail horribly. In the example above, entry.getKey() still returns an Object reference, but due to the type parameters the compiler automatically casts the result to a String. You can verify this in the byte code which contains a corresponding checkcast instruction after entry.getKey() has been invoked.

The general rule is: do not use raw types. Especially with large legacy code bases, there are sometimes occasions where Collections are still created without the proper usage of type parameters (but later returned through parameterized types). Thus, the learning is: Even if you get a reference to a properly parameterized Collection type, do not be surprised if there are other types stored in it when you iterate over the Collection values or keys.

Back to our dumping method, we can simply solve the issue by not forcing any implicit casts:

Set<Entry<String, Long>> entries = map.entrySet();
for (Entry<String, Long> entry : entries) {
    Object key = entry.getKey();
    Object value = entry.getValue();
    System.err.printf("%s=%s\n", key, value);

When run, this will produce the expected output:


Displaying results 1 to 4 out of 101
<< First < Previous 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 21-24 25-28 Next > Last >>